The following example in UEB 9.6.2 is showing an example where distinction is necessary. As explained in that text, abbreviations in small caps are generally transcribed with capital indicators. The example of PT109 in UEB 9.6.1 is showing an abbreviation in small caps. Because of all this, Braille Formats 2016 2.10.8 says to use title case for small caps in a table of contents. Therefore, the identification of small caps is not shown. Nor do these entries need to be emphasized in any way. “Foreword”, etc., are already set apart with a blank line and indention. Small caps need to be shown where distinction or emphasis is required for the understanding of the text. Capitals may be used within small caps, but small caps themselves are not capitals. But the use of small caps is not capitalization. We are to follow print for capitalization, yes.
Shouldn't this be enclosed in TNs as words such as Volume and The End are enclosed? The directions say to continue the chapter heading with (contd.). Section 19.2b, page 19-17 of the Lessons. Unfortunately, this question was never answered.Īnother question. There's another post with a question exactly like mine dated (#10283) about small caps in a table of contents. It doesn't seem to need any emphasis or distinction but. Not even capping the whole word?Ĭan you tell me what rule was used? I've read a post from this site dated Aug.17, 2015 (#22824) about setting the braille off if it needs emphasis or distinction.
The brailled Table of Contents on page 19-18 doesn't use any of these examples-didn't follow print, cap the whole word, or use a typeform indicator. "When the typeform change is significant. The following section 9.6.2 describes using small caps for emphasis or distinction and uses a Transcriber-Defined typeform indicator.
The example on page 98, Section 9.6.1 of the UEB Rules shows PT109 (small caps) as. I am lost in the Twilight Zone of Small Caps and Distinction.